<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Use PLR to Benefit the Bottom Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theimlearningcenter.com/450/how-to-use-plr-to-benefit-the-bottom-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theimlearningcenter.com/450/how-to-use-plr-to-benefit-the-bottom-line/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://theimlearningcenter.com/450/how-to-use-plr-to-benefit-the-bottom-line/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimlearningcenter.com/?p=450#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d never considered what you&#039;ve written about with regard to PLRs. Thanks for those tips. You hear some many arguments for and against using PLRs that I didn&#039;t take the time to look at them from another perspective. That&#039;s cleared up now that you provided some alternatives. 

I had noticed that some PLR material is just too quaint to even be considered, while I&#039;ve read some that were actually pretty good and informative. I guess the old saying about &quot;diamonds in the rough&quot; applies to PLR as with many other things.

Again, thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d never considered what you&#8217;ve written about with regard to PLRs. Thanks for those tips. You hear some many arguments for and against using PLRs that I didn&#8217;t take the time to look at them from another perspective. That&#8217;s cleared up now that you provided some alternatives. </p>
<p>I had noticed that some PLR material is just too quaint to even be considered, while I&#8217;ve read some that were actually pretty good and informative. I guess the old saying about &#8220;diamonds in the rough&#8221; applies to PLR as with many other things.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

